Last updated: 2024-06-15

Checks: 1 1

Knit directory: dynamicHRpaper/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.


The R Markdown file has unstaged changes. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 63dbdbd. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    Figs/Fig3/interaction_time_byage_withPCS.tiff
    Ignored:    Figs/Fig3/interaction_time_byage_withPCS_2.tiff
    Ignored:    data/amit_df.rds
    Ignored:    data/amit_df_with_pc_correction.rds
    Ignored:    data/baseline_withPCS.rds
    Ignored:    data/fh_full.rds
    Ignored:    data/fh_prs.rds
    Ignored:    data/fhs_prs_with_pc_corrrection.rds
    Ignored:    data/followupdates.rds
    Ignored:    data/genotype_data_nodup.eigenvec
    Ignored:    output/amit_df_with_pc_correction.rds
    Ignored:    output/fhs_prs_with_pc_corrrection.rds
    Ignored:    output/h1hs_withPC.rds
    Ignored:    output/hall_withPC.rds
    Ignored:    output/hallpce.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex0.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex1.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_UKB_amit_EQ_withPCcorrection.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_lowerbound_amit_EQ_withPCcorrection.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_lowerbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_lowerbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex0.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_lowerbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex1.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_upperbound_amit_EQ_withPCcorrection.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_upperbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_upperbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex0.rds
    Ignored:    output/hazards_rate_upperbound_fh_EQ_withPC_corrections_sex1.rds
    Ignored:    output/r2_withPC.rds
    Ignored:    output/r2fhs_withPC.rds
    Ignored:    output/r2pce.rds
    Ignored:    output/statinuse.rds
    Ignored:    output/zph_all.rds
    Ignored:    output/zph_amit_EQ.rds

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   analysis/index.Rmd

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.


These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd) and HTML (docs/index.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
Rmd 63dbdbd Sarah Urbut 2024-06-15 Update
html 63dbdbd Sarah Urbut 2024-06-15 Update
html 3c8102f Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
Rmd ae5b719 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
html ae5b719 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
html 490e529 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
Rmd 88231db Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
html 88231db Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 Update
Rmd 111b7d1 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 update
html 111b7d1 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 update
Rmd e42fc49 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 update
html e42fc49 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-13 update
Rmd 7cc198e Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 update
html 7cc198e Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 update
html 8a9060f Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 Update
Rmd cef5b27 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 Update
html cef5b27 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 Update
html 9d06964 Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 Update
Rmd c48abee Sarah Urbut 2024-06-12 Update

Welcome to a detailed reproduction of all analyses in the Dynamic Hazard paper, Urbut et al 2024.

Figure 1 Here is the hazard rate and proportion of variation explained in the UK Biobank and

Figure 1b Here is the hazard rate and proportion of variation explained in the Framingham Offspring Cohort

Figure 2 Here are the relative and absolute rates of CAD by PRS and PCE percentile for three age categories

Figure 3 Here is the stratification by age and PCE using the UK Biobank

Figure 4 Here is the proportion of future events captured using a PCE threshold of 7.5% versus a PRS threshold of greater than 80% to predict future events

Figure 1 Supplemental Here is the net reclassification of events and non events using PCE versus PRS

Figure 2 Supplemental Here is the proportion of individuals in each PCE risk class by age

Validation

Proportional Hazards Here is the demonstration cox PH is violated with typical model.

Cumulative Events Here I plot cumulative events by ACVD strata or by age.

Density Plots Here I show PRS distirbution for overall cohort, and for ours, with different scaling.

Lipid Plot Here I show detailed analysis of statin use by age of enrollment in the FOS.

Age of Menopause Plot Here I show detailed analysis of hazard ratios by sex in FOS and age of enrollment by menopause.

Sex Specific Thresholding Here I show detailed analysis of proportion of events assessed, Age of event, and AUC using females only.

Sex Specific Thresholding Here I show detailed analysis of the relationships between absolute and relative PRS in females only.

Sex Specific Thresholding Here I show detailed analysis of the relationships between absolute and relative PRS in males only.

Tables

We also have a variety of exlucsion tables and summary tables

Table 1 Here is the summary characterisitics of each cohort, and of division by ASCVD and PRS risk calss in the UK Biobank subset

Exclusions Here are the flowcharts of exclusionary criteria for creating the cohorts used in these analyses.